From ChatGPT to Autonomous Agents: A Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis of Agentic Artificial Intelligence in Organizations

Authors

Bogdan Costache
Bucharest University of Economic Studies image/svg+xml
Author
Vladimir Aurelian Enǎchescu
Bucharest University of Economic Studies image/svg+xml
Author
Costin Petcu
Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy image/svg+xml
Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65222/VIRAL.2026.7.40.60

Keywords:

Agentic Artificial Intelligence Autonomous Agents Artificial Intelligence Governance Large Language Models Multi-Agent Systems Human-AI Collaboration Organizational Decision Making

Abstract

The rapid diffusion of generative artificial intelligence has altered the technological and organizational landscape, shifting scholarly and managerial attention from systems primarily designed to generate content toward increasingly autonomous systems capable of planning, reasoning, coordinating actions, and pursuing goals with limited human intervention. This transition has given rise to the concept of agentic artificial intelligence, a broad category encompassing autonomous agents, multi-agent systems, and emerging forms of AI-enabled organizational actors. Despite growing academic and practitioner interest, the literature remains fragmented across computer science, information systems, management, and organizational studies, with limited conceptual integration regarding the implications of agentic AI for organizational design, governance, and leadership.

This study addresses this fragmentation through a systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis of the emerging research domain of agentic artificial intelligence in organizations. Following PRISMA guidelines, the study employs a structured search strategy using the Scopus and Web of Science databases and applies performance analysis and science-mapping techniques through Bibliometrix and VOSviewer. The analysis identifies the principal intellectual foundations of the field, the most influential authors, journals, and countries, and the thematic trajectories that have shaped scholarly discussions from early research on autonomous agents and multi-agent systems to contemporary debates on AI governance and organizational transformation.

The findings reveal a significant shift from technical investigations of autonomous systems toward questions concerning organizational decision-making, human-agent collaboration, governance mechanisms, and the strategic implications of increasingly autonomous AI systems. Six major research themes emerge from the literature: autonomous decision-making systems, multi-agent collaboration, agentic AI governance, human-agent interaction, organizational transformation and leadership, and ethical and societal risks. Building on these findings, the article develops an Agentic AI Organizational Transformation Framework that conceptualizes agentic AI as a dynamic organizational capability whose outcomes depend on governance arrangements, organizational readiness, and institutional trust.

The study contributes to the literature in three ways. First, it provides the first integrative mapping of agentic artificial intelligence research from an organizational perspective. Second, it advances a conceptual framework linking agentic AI capabilities to organizational outcomes and governance mechanisms. Third, it develops a future research agenda aimed at supporting empirical investigations of autonomous AI systems in complex organizational environments. The article concludes that agentic artificial intelligence should not be viewed merely as an incremental extension of generative AI but rather as a potentially transformative organizational phenomenon that may redefine decision-making processes, leadership practices, and the boundaries between human and artificial agency.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Aalst, W. M. P. van der, Bichler, M., & Heinzl, A. (2018). Robotic process automation. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 60(4), 269-272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-018-0542-4

2. Agostino, D., Arnaboldi, M., & Lampis, A. (2021). Italian state museums during the COVID-19 crisis: From onsite closure to online openness. Museum Management and Curatorship, 36(4), 362-372.

3. Amershi, S., Weld, D., Vorvoreanu, M., Fourney, A., Nushi, B., Collisson, P., Suh, J., Iqbal, S., Bennett, P. N., & Inkpen, K. (2019). Guidelines for human-AI interaction. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-13). ACM.

4. Brynjolfsson, E., Li, D., & Raymond, L. R. (2023). Generative AI at work. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series, No. 31161. https://doi.org/10.3386/w31161

5. Cao, L. (2022). AI in finance: Challenges, techniques and opportunities. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(3), 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1145/3502289

6. Chui, M., Hall, B., Mayhew, H., & Singla, A. (2023). The economic potential of generative AI: The next productivity frontier. McKinsey Global Institute Report.

7. Crawford, K. (2021). Atlas of AI: Power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence. Yale University Press.

8. Dafoe, A. (2018). AI governance: A research agenda. Governance of AI Program, Future of Humanity Institute, University of Oxford.

9. Dellermann, D., Ebel, P., Söllner, M., & Leimeister, J. M. (2019). Hybrid intelligence. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 61(5), 637-643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-019-00595-2

10. Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Baabdullah, A. M., Ribeiro-Navarrete, S., Giannakis, M., Al-Debei, M. M., Dennehy, D., Metri, B., Buhalis, D., Cheung, 11. C. M. K., Conboy, K., Doyle, R., Dubey, R., Dutot, V., Felix, R., Goyal, D. P., Gustafsson, A., Hinsch, C., Jebabli, I., ... Wright, R. (2023). So what if ChatGPT wrote it? Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642

12. Etzioni, O., & Etzioni, N. (2017). Incorporating ethics into artificial intelligence. The Journal of Ethics, 21(4), 403-418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-017-9252-2

13. European Commission. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Act. Publications Office of the European Union.

14. Feuerriegel, S., Hartmann, J., Janiesch, C., & Zschech, P. (2020). AI in business and economics. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 62(4), 343-360.

15. Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., Luetge, C., Madelin, R., Pagallo, U., Rossi, F., Schafer, B., Valcke, P., & Vayena, E. (2018). AI4People - An ethical framework for a good AI society. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689-707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5

16. Galbraith, J. R. (1974). Organization design: An information processing view. Interfaces, 4(3), 28-36. https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.4.3.28

17. George, G., Lakhani, K. R., & Puranam, P. (2023). What has changed? The impact of generative artificial intelligence on the future of work. Management and Organization Review, 19(4), 537-546.

18. Haenlein, M., & Kaplan, A. (2019). A brief history of artificial intelligence. California Management Review, 61(4), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619864925

19. Haenlein, M., Kaplan, A., Tan, C. W., & Zhang, P. (2022). Artificial intelligence and management: The automation-augmentation paradox. Academy of Management Perspectives, 36(1), 192-210.

20. Huang, M. H., & Rust, R. T. (2021). A strategic framework for artificial intelligence in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 49(1), 30-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-020-00749-9

21. Jarrahi, M. H. (2018). Artificial intelligence and the future of work. Business Horizons, 61(4), 577-586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.03.007

22. Kellogg, K. C., Valentine, M. A., & Christin, A. (2020). Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of control. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 366-410. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0174

23. Kitsios, F., & Kamariotou, M. (2021). Artificial intelligence and business strategy towards digital transformation. Sustainability, 13(4), 2025. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042025

24. Korzynski, P., Mazurek, G., Altmann, A., & Ejdys, J. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence as a new context for management theories. Central European Management Journal, 31(4), 3-13.

25. LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436-444. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539

26. Liu, P., Yuan, W., Fu, J., Jiang, Z., Hayashi, H., & Neubig, G. (2023). Pre-train, prompt, and predict: A systematic survey of prompting methods in natural language processing. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(9), 1-35.

27. Mikalef, P., Krogstie, J., Pappas, I. O., & Pavlou, P. (2020). Exploring the relationship between big data analytics capability and competitive performance. British Journal of Management, 31(2), 272-293

28. Newell, S., Marabelli, M., & Galliers, R. D. (2023). Artificial intelligence and the future of work: A sociotechnical perspective. Journal of Information Technology, 38(2), 89-104.

29. OpenAI. (2023). GPT-4 technical report. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.08774

30. Park, Y., & Woo, J. (2022). Understanding human-AI interaction through sociotechnical perspectives. Information Systems Frontiers, 24(6), 1731-1747.

31. Puranam, P. (2021). Human-AI collaboration and the future of organizations. Organization Theory, 2(1), 1-23.

32. Raisch, S., & Krakowski, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence and management: The automation-augmentation paradox. Academy of Management Review, 46(1), 192-210. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2018.0072

33. Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (4th ed.). Pearson.

34. Shrestha, Y. R., Ben-Menahem, S. M., & von Krogh, G. (2019). Organizational decision-making structures in the age of artificial intelligence. California Management Review, 61(4), 66-83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619862257

35. Simon, H. A. (1977). The new science of management decision (Rev. ed.). Prentice-Hall.

36. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640

37. Uhl-Bien, M., & Arena, M. (2018). Leadership for organizational adaptability. Organizational Dynamics, 47(2), 89-99.

38. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3

39. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2014). Visualizing bibliometric networks. In Y. Ding, R. Rousseau, & D. Wolfram (Eds.), Measuring scholarly impact (pp. 285-320). Springer.

40. van Osch, W., & Mendelson, O. (2011). A typology of organizational forms for digital innovation. Information Systems Journal, 21(4), 389-415.

41. Waltman, L., & Van Eck, N. J. (2013). A smart local moving algorithm for large-scale modularity-based community detection. European Physical Journal B, 86(11), 471.

42. Wang, Y., Kung, L., & Byrd, T. A. (2018). Big data analytics. Information & Management, 55(6), 707-719.

43. Wessel, M., Baiyere, A., Ologeanu-Taddei, R., Cha, J., & Jensen, T. (2021). Unpacking the difference between digital transformation and IT-enabled organizational transformation. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 22(1), 102-129.

44. Wooldridge, M. (2009). An introduction to multiagent systems (2nd ed.). Wiley.

45. Wooldridge, M. (2020). The road to conscious machines. Pelican.

46. Yoo, Y., Boland, R. J., Lyytinen, K., & Majchrzak, A. (2012). Organizing for innovation in the digitized world. Organization Science, 23(5), 1398-1408. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0771

47. Zhang, P., Lu, Y., & Kizildag, M. (2023). Autonomous AI agents and organizational transformation: Emerging challenges and opportunities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 194, 122708.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-04

How to Cite

Costache, B., Enǎchescu, V. A., & Petcu, C. (2026). From ChatGPT to Autonomous Agents: A Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis of Agentic Artificial Intelligence in Organizations. International Journal of Education, Leadership, Artificial Intelligence, Computing, Business, Life Sciences, and Society, 10, 1-65. https://doi.org/10.65222/VIRAL.2026.7.40.60

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 > >> 
Published by VIRAL A* A

Welcome to VIRAL A* Journal

This is a professional academic journal header template with modern design and functionality. The interface is fully responsive and optimized for all devices.

Submit your cutting-edge research in AI, machine learning, and intelligent systems.

Explore our collection of peer-reviewed articles and research papers.

Read the latest articles from our current journal issue.