Overton Leadership: Shifting Legitimacy Boundaries as a Strategic Capability in Complex Adaptive Systems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65222/viral.5.1.41Keywords:
Abstract
Purpose: This article develops a novel theory of Overton Leadership, conceptualizing leadership as the strategic management of legitimacy boundaries in complex adaptive systems. It addresses a critical gap in leadership theory: how leaders expand the range of perceived acceptable strategic options under conditions of institutional constraint and normative resistance. Design/Methodology/Approach: The study adopts a theory-building approach integrating institutional theory, complexity leadership, strategic framing, and legitimacy scholarship. A dynamic conceptual model is developed specifying core constructs, structural relationships, and formal propositions. The framework is expressed through a longitudinal equation model enabling empirical operationalization. Findings: We theorize that Overton Leadership operates through narrative reframing and stakeholder cognitive realignment, resulting in legitimacy window expansion and strategic option growth. Organizational trust moderates reframing effectiveness, while environmental volatility accelerates legitimacy shifts. The model distinguishes leadership that adapts within constraints from leadership that redefines constraints. Theoretical Contributions: The article contributes to leadership theory by: (1) Reframing leadership as legitimacy-boundary management; (2) Extending institutional entrepreneurship through a leader-centric dynamic model; (3) Formalizing legitimacy expansion as a measurable rate-of-change construct; (3) Integrating narrative framing into dynamic systems modeling. Practical Implications: In AI governance, ESG transitions, and digital platform regulation, leaders must strategically expand normative acceptance before implementing transformative strategies. Overton Leadership provides a systematic framework for managing such shifts. Originality/Value: This is the first formal theory positioning leadership as the dynamic expansion of the legitimacy window. It introduces a measurable construct of legitimacy shift and establishes a foundation for longitudinal empirical testing across organizational, technological, and governance domains.
References
1. Aftab, J., Stan, M. R., Srivastava, M., Wei, F., & Abid, N. (2025). The Impact of Digital Leadership on Performance: Examining the Roles of Big Data Analytical Capabilities, Green Innovation, and AI Change Readiness in Italian SMEs. Business Strategy and the Environment.
2. Anagnostou-Laoutides, E. (2026). From Vergil to the Bible: leadership and literature under Constantine.
3. Aniche, A. A., Bundy, H., & McKee, K. E. (2025). Agents for change: developing transformative and Adaptive Leadership capacities among early-career extension professionals. Journal of Leadership Education, 24(1), 1-15.
4. Asad, M. M., Rind, A. A., & Almusharraf, N. M. (2026). Challenges and mitigating strategies for sustainable development of digitally transformed community 5.0: Insights from the higher education leadership. Asian Education and Development Studies, 1-23.
5. Bansal, P., Kistruck, G., & Gao, J. (2018). Sustainability as practice: The role of sensemaking in translating institutional pressures into organizational responses. Academy of Management Journal, 61(6), 2237–2266. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.1165
6. Battilana, J., Leca, B., & Boxenbaum, E. (2009). How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 65–107. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520903053598
7. Bitektine, A., & Haack, P. (2015). The “macro” and the “micro” of legitimacy: Toward a multilevel theory of the legitimacy process. Academy of Management Review, 40(1), 49–75.
8. Bǎrbulescu, R., Matei , M.-A., & Latea, C.-D. (2026). Teaching sustainability in economics through game-based learning: an interdisciplinary approach. International Journal of Education, Leadership, Artificial Intelligence, Computing, Business, Life Sciences, and Society, 4(04), 12-20. https://doi.org/10.65222/VIRAL.2026.1.2.22
9. Bhatnagr, P. (2026). Fostering agility through leadership in technology firms. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 47(1), 1-24.
10. Bock, T., & von der Oelsnitz, D. (2025). Leadership-competences in the era of artificial intelligence–a structured review. Strategy & Leadership, 53(3), 235-255.
11. Boyar, S. L., Savage, G. T., & Williams, E. S. (2023). An adaptive leadership approach: The impact of reasoning and emotional intelligence (EI) abilities on leader adaptability. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 35(4), 565-580.
12. Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age. W. W. Norton.
13. Buhmann, A., & Fieseler, C. (2023). Deep learning meets deep responsibility: Responsible AI governance in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 184(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05156-6
14. Cangiano, F., & Carlucci, P. (2026). Leadership in irregular warfare: integrating adaptive, empowering, complexity, and authentic approaches. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 1-34.
15. Chughtai, M. S., Syed, F., Naseer, S., & Chinchilla, N. (2024). Role of adaptive leadership in learning organizations to boost organizational innovations with change self-efficacy. Current Psychology, 43(33), 27262-27281.
16. Cornelissen, J. P., & Werner, M. D. (2014). Putting framing in perspective: A review of framing and frame analysis across the management and organizational literature. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 181–235.
17. D'Angelo, V. (2026). Three Essays on the Role of Corporate Ownership and Governance in the ESG Transition.
18. Deng, C., Gulseren, D., Isola, C., Grocutt, K., & Turner, N. (2023). Transformational leadership effectiveness: an evidence-based primer. Human Resource Development International, 26(5), 627-641.
19. Deephouse, D. L. (1996). Does isomorphism legitimate? Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 1024–1039.
20. Del Pozo, B., Nevill, R. E., Cepeda, J., Adams, I. T., Whiteside, A., & Thompson, E. (2026). Why innovations in policing don’t work or don’t translate: An implementation science survey of US police leaders. Police Practice and Research, 27(1), 110-130.
21. DiMaggio, P. J. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. In L. G. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations (pp. 3–21). Ballinger.
22. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.
23. Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835–2857.
24. Edwards III, G. C., Mayer, K. R., & Wayne, S. J. (2026). Presidential leadership: Politics and policy making. Bloomsbury Publishing USA.
25. Erfiyana, E., Kartika, I., & Arifudin, O. (2026). Transformational Leadership of School Principals in Developing Islamic Education in Elementary Madrasahs. International Journal Of Science Education and Technology Management (IJSETM), 5(1), 32-44.
26. Eitan, T., & Bronstein, J. (2026). Servant dictators: the paradoxical leadership of social media administrators. Current Psychology, 45(1), 24.
27. Enachescu, V., & Petcu, C. (2025). Transformational leadership and emotional intelligence in hybrid academic ecosystems: managerial paradigms for enhancing institutional resilience and student wellbeing. International Journal of Education, Leadership, Artificial Intelligence, Computing, Business, Life Sciences, and Society, 1(01), 59-75.
28. Enang, I., Omeihe, K. O., Omeihe, I., Enang, I., & Enang, U. (2026). Integrative leadership in complex adaptive systems: a multi-modal analysis of strategic decision-making processes. Strategy & Leadership, 54(1), 88-119.
29. Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. (2014). Industry platforms and ecosystem innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(3), 417–433.
30. Garud, R., Hardy, C., & Maguire, S. (2007). Institutional entrepreneurship as embedded agency. Organization Studies, 28(7), 957–969.
31. Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes. Research Policy, 31(8–9), 1257–1274.
32. Geels, F. W. (2011). The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 24–40.
33. Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the internet. Yale University Press.
34. Grint, K. (2005). Problems, problems, problems: The social construction of “leadership.” Human Relations, 58(11), 1467–1494.
35. Heifetz, R. A. (1994). Leadership without easy answers. Harvard University Press.
36. Heifetz, R. A., & Linsky, M. (2002). Leadership on the line. Harvard Business School Press.
37. Horlings, L. G., & Wills, J. (2025). Subnational leadership in response to environment and climate change. Regional Studies, 59(1), 2399264.
38. Hotchkiss, D. (2026). Governance and ministry: Rethinking board leadership. Bloomsbury Publishing USA.
39. Ismail, R. T., & Karamanlıoğlu, A. U. (2026). AI Capabilities and Its Impact on Organisational Innovation in Malaysian SMEs: The Role of Transformational Leadership and Digital Organisational Culture. Sustainability, 18(3), 1473.
40. Joshi, S. (2025). Review of Artificial Intelligence in Management, Leadership, Decision-Making and Collaboration.
41. Kaplan, S. (2008). Framing contests: Strategy making under uncertainty. Organization Science, 19(5), 729–752.
42. Kayyali, M. (2026). Agile Leadership and Labor Dynamics: Navigating Organizational Change in the Digital Era. In Leading Inclusive Workplaces Through Digital Transformation and Organizational Change (pp. 1-36). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
43. Khairy, H. A., & Badwy, H. E. (2026). Adaptive leadership and resilience: The mediating and moderating pathways to green competitiveness in the hospitality sector. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights, 9(1), 20-42.
44. Karagkouni, A., & Dimitriou, D. (2025). The Overton Window in Smart City Governance: The Methodology and Results for Mediterranean Cities. Smart Cities, 8(3), 98.
45. Kroll, A., Jacobson, W. S., & Isett, K. R. (2026). Performance management in collaborations: exploring associations between distributed leadership and collective performance data use. Public Management Review, 28(1), 1-23.
46. Kuknor, S. C., & Bhattacharya, S. (2022). Inclusive leadership: new age leadership to foster organizational inclusion. European journal of training and development, 46(9), 771-797.
47. Lawrence, T. B., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutions and institutional work. In S. Clegg et al. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organization studies (pp. 215–254). Sage.
48. Lawrence, T. B., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (2011). Institutional work: Refocusing institutional studies of organization. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20(1), 52–58.
49. Linnenluecke, M. K., & Griffiths, A. (2010). Corporate sustainability and organizational culture. Journal of World Business, 45(4), 357–366.
50. Liu, S., & Hallinger, P. (2026). The effect of department leadership on teacher professional learning in China: A multilevel moderated mediation model. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 54(1), 6-27.
51. Luo, Y. (2022). New connectivity in the fragmented world. Journal of International Business Studies, 53(5), 962–987.
52. Malik, M., Raziq, M. M., Sarwar, N., & Gohar, M. (2025). Navigating the change: a case study of the textile industry on digital leadership, digital transformation and innovative business models. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 32(2), 550-577.
53. Marion, R., & Uhl-Bien, M. (2001). Leadership in complex organizations. The Leadership Quarterly, 12(4), 389–418.
54. Mayer, C. H. (2026). Compassionate love in leaders: Leadership solutions in the fourth industrial revolution. In International Handbook of Love: Transcultural and Transdisciplinary Perspectives (pp. 1151-1174). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
55. Mazhabi, Z. (2025). Investigating leadership attributes and strategies during times of crisis and educational change: A story of public primary school principals in Lombok, Indonesia. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 17411432241300280.
56. Medlama, M., Vianney, L., Piring, R., Ilham, S., & Annamalah, S. (2025). The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Leadership Decision-Making: Opportunities and Challenges. Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis, 32, 1878.
57. Muss, C., Tüxen, D., & Fürstenau, B. (2026). Empathy in leadership: a systematic literature review on the effects of empathetic leaders in organizations. Management Review Quarterly, 76(1), 333-369.
58. Northouse, P. G. (2021). Leadership: Theory and practice (9th ed.). Sage.
59. Orlikowski, W. J., & Scott, S. V. (2008). Sociomateriality. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 433–474.
60. Pasquale, F. (2015). The black box society. Harvard University Press.
61. Petcu, C., Enăchescu, V. A., & Bejinariu, C. G. (2025). LEADERSHIP FOR LIFELONG LEARNING: PREPARING MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS FOR DYNAMIC HEALTHCARE LANDSCAPES. In INTED2025 Proceedings (pp. 6934-6940). IATED.
62. Plowman, D. A., et al. (2007). The role of leadership in emergent change. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 515–543.
63. Ransbotham, S., et al. (2020). Expanding AI’s impact with organizational learning. MIT Sloan Management Review.
64. Ransbotham, S., Kiron, D., LaFountain, B., & Khodabandeh, S. (2020). The cultural benefits of artificial intelligence in the enterprise. MIT Sloan Management Review.
65. Rizvi, Y. S., & Khan, S. (2026). Leadership Culture and Technology as an Integrated System for ESG Excellence and Climate Ready Transformation. In Addressing Climate Change Through Socially Responsible Business Transformation (pp. 183-218). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
66. Ruiz-Palomino, P., Yanez-Araque, B., Gutiérrez-Broncano, S., & Jiménez Estévez, P. (2025). Unlocking organizational change: servant leadership, change resistance and the mediating role of emotional intelligence. Management Decision.
67. Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities (4th ed.). Sage.
68. Sott, M. K., & Bender, M. S. (2025). The role of adaptive leadership in times of crisis: A systematic review and conceptual framework. Merits, 5(1), 2.
69. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.
70. Taeihagh, A. (2021). Governance of artificial intelligence. Policy and Society, 40(2), 137–157.
71. Than, S. T., Le, P. B., Thanh Ha, C., & Nguyen, D. T. N. (2026). Determinants of innovation performance: influence of knowledge-oriented leadership, knowledge sharing and organizational justice. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 75(1-2), 460-476.
72. Tost, L. P. (2011). An integrative model of legitimacy judgments. Academy of Management Review, 36(4), 686–710.
73. Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., & McKelvey, B. (2007). Complexity leadership theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(4), 298–318.
75. Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421.
76. Westley, F. R., et al. (2013). A theory of transformative agency. Ecology and Society, 18(3).
77. Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.). Pearson.
78. Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism. PublicAffairs.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Education, Leadership, Artificial Intelligence, Computing, Business, Life Sciences, and Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.