Rethinking Higher Education in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Educating for Post-Human Organizations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65222/Keywords:
Abstract
Artificial intelligence is transforming organizational structures and challenging traditional assumptions regarding work, knowledge, and human capabilities. As organizations increasingly integrate intelligent systems into their operations, higher education institutions face growing pressure to prepare graduates for post-human organizational environments characterized by human-machine collaboration and continuous technological adaptation. This paper explores the implications of artificial intelligence for higher education and examines the competencies required for successful participation in post-human organizations. The study develops a conceptual framework that integrates educational transformation with emerging theories of organizational change and technological evolution. The findings indicate that future educational models should emphasize interdisciplinary learning, adaptability, ethical reasoning, and systems thinking. The paper contributes to discussions on the future of higher education by proposing strategies for preparing graduates to navigate increasingly complex and technologically mediated organizational environments.
Downloads
References
1. Aboderin, O. S. (2025). Exploring integration of 4IR technologies in Nigerian universities: Implications for pedagogy and skills development. International Journal of Education, Leadership, Artificial Intelligence, Computing, Business, Life Sciences, and Society, 2(02), 50-66. https://doi.org/10.65222/VIRAL.2025.9.9
2. Appelbaum, P. (2024). Post-Anthropocene Civic and Global Education Studies: Beyond Posthuman Perspectives (Vol. 15). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-71881-6
3. Al-Amoudi, I. (2023). The politics of post-human technologies: Human enhancements, artificial intelligence and virtual reality. Organization, 30(6), 1238-1245 .https://doi.org/10.1177/13505084231189269.
4. Bayne, S. (2015). Teacherbot: Interventions in automated teaching. Teaching in Higher Education, 20(4), 455-467. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2015.1020783
5. Bǎrbulescu, R., Matei, M. A., & Latea, C. D. (2026). Teaching sustainability in economics through game-based learning: An interdisciplinary approach. International Journal of Education, Leadership, Artificial Intelligence, Computing, Business, Life Sciences, and Society, 4(04), 12-20. https://doi.org/10.65222/VIRAL.2026.1.2.22
6. Billsberry, J. (2026). Dehumanising leadership: AI and the construction of post-human leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 47(2), 282-293.
7. Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.
8. Chhabra, G., Mehdian, N., & Vasishta, P. (2024). Rethinking higher educational practices in the age of artificial intelligence. In 2024 IEEE 5th India Council International Subsections Conference (INDISCON) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/INDISCON62179.2024.10744297
9. Chiu, T. K. F. (2024). Future research recommendations for transforming higher education with generative AI. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100197.
10. De Vaujany, F. X., Gherardi, S., & Silva, P. (2024). Organization studies and posthumanism. Routledge.
11. Do, N. B., Nguyen, H. M., & Do, H. N. (2026). Optimism or pessimism? Rethinking artificial intelligence experience in higher education institutions - the mediation and moderation analysis. Entrepreneurship Education, 1-20.
12. Dung, D. A., Toan, N. T., Minh, N. D., & Anh, N. Q. (2026). Reimagining quality: Artificial intelligence, governance and the politics of data in higher education. Higher Education for the Future, 13(1), 50-73.
13. Fan, R., & Li, Y. Y. (2026). Mediating the post-human: Cultural implications of generative AI in everyday communication. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 32(1), 4.
14. Floridi, L., & Chiriatti, M. (2020). GPT-3: Its nature, scope, limits, and consequences. Minds and Machines, 30(4), 681-694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-020-09548-1
15. Ghasemi, S., & Izadpanah, A. (2026). Rethinking the concept of learning in the age of artificial intelligence: The possibilities and limitations of human education. Assessment and Practice in Educational Sciences, 4(2), 1-13.
16. Herbrechter, S. (2018). Posthumanism and the ends of education. Routledge.
17. Jandrić, P. (2020). Postdigital research in the time of COVID-19. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(2), 233-238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00113-8
18. Jensen, L. X., Buhl, A., Sharma, A., & Bearman, M. (2025). Generative AI and higher education: A review of claims from the first months of ChatGPT. Higher Education, 89(4), 1145-1161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-024-01265-3
19. Kelly, A., Sullivan, M., & Strampel, K. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence: University student awareness, experience, and confidence in use across disciplines. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 20(6), 1-16.
20. Kimalel, B. (2025). The impact of social media on competency-based curriculum skills acquisition among pupils in Chesumei constituency, Nandi County, Kenya. International Journal of Education, Leadership, Artificial Intelligence, Computing, Business, Life Sciences, and Society, 3, 22-39. https://doi.org/10.65222/VIRAL.2025.11.16
21. Labraña, J., & Rodríguez-Ponce, E. (2026). Artificial intelligence and organizational learning in universities: Decision premises, paradoxes, and institutional stability. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 1-16.
22. Luckin, R. (2025). Nurturing human intelligence in the age of AI: Rethinking education for the future. Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal, 39(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1108/DLO-04-2024-0108
23. Nguyen, T. D., Le, T. Q., Luong, G. T., & Nguyen, D. T. (2025). A review of applying game-based learning and learning motivation. International Journal of Education, Leadership, Artificial Intelligence, Computing, Business, Life Sciences, and Society, 3, 67-74. https://doi.org/10.65222/VIRAL.2025.12.20
24. Ncube, P. D., Dzvapatsva, G. P., Matobobo, C., & Ranga, M. M. (2026). Redefining student assessment in AI-infused learning environments: A systematic review of challenges and strategies for academic integrity. AI and Ethics, 6(1), 68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-025-00871-w
25. Ruano-Borbalan, J. C. (2025). The transformative impact of artificial intelligence on higher education: A critical reflection on current trends and future directions. International Journal of Chinese Education, 14(1), 2212585X251319364. https://doi.org/10.1177/2212585X251319364
26. Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Cambridge: Polity Press.
27. Shallari, I., Rollins, M., Zhao, X., & Carratù, M. (2026). Introduction to the minitrack on generative artificial intelligence in higher education. Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
28. Shapiro, S. J., & Lam, V. D. (2026). Bridging the AI divide: Equity, integrity, and the governance of generative AI in higher education. In Rethinking Education and Agency in the Age of Human-Generative AI Interaction (pp. 183-220). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
29. Snaza, N., & Weaver, J. A. (Eds.). (2015). Posthumanism and educational research (Vol. 35). Routledge.
30. Sol, K., Sok, S., & Heng, K. (2025). Rethinking assessment in higher education in the age of generative AI. In Encyclopedia of Educational Innovation. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2262-4_327-1
31. Tallberg, L., & Huopalainen, A. (2024). We are the missing people: On posthumanist onto-epistemologies in organization studies. In Organization Studies and Posthumanism (pp. 29-52). Routledge.
32. Vega, J. (2026). Rethinking AI in the age of climate collapse: Ethics, power, and responsibility. arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.18462. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.18462
33. Vulpe, M. I., Stancu, S., Munteanu, P., & Bǎrbulescu, R. (2026). Digital divide and technological exclusion: Strategies for inclusive ICT skill development in adult education. International Journal of Education, Leadership, Artificial Intelligence, Computing, Business, Life Sciences, and Society, 5, 81-92. ttps://doi.org/10.65222/VIRAL.2026.2.12.32
34. Weber, S. M., Spahn, L., & Heidelmann, M. A. (2024). Transcending critique: Towards a post-anthropocentric approach in organizational education research. In Organisation und Kritik: Jahrbuch der Sektion Organisationspädagogik (pp. 105-118). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Education, Leadership, Artificial Intelligence, Computing, Business, Life Sciences, and Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.