Lexical synonymy and its impact on second language acquisition
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65222/VIRAL.2026.2.8.28Keywords:
Abstract
Aim: The purpose of the paper is to explore the importance of synonymy in the acquisition of second languages and the influence of literary texts (the language of literature) in enriching vocabularies, new meanings of words and their synonymous forms, within the same type, the type of artistic literature. In general, we have analyzed the influence of synonymous forms in the second language acquisition as well as native language acquisition.
Methods: The research employs a mixed-methods approach, integrating both quantitative and qualitative analyses. Data was collected through a Google Forms questionnaire completed by 71 students from two universities in Albania, assessing their linguistic formation and comprehension of synonymy. Additionally, 15 literary texts from English language textbooks were analyzed at the word level, free phrase level, and within phraseological expressions. The collected data was processed using statistical analysis to interpret the research questions.
Results: The analysis of literary texts indicates that exposure to figurative language enhances students' imaginative perception. However, questionnaire results suggest that many students struggle with abstraction and tend to replace figurative expressions with more concrete and general terms. A significant portion of participants demonstrated a limited ability to incorporate figurative language into their writing.
Conclusions: Cognitive interconnections between languages play a crucial role in developing fundamental linguistic competencies. The findings highlight that a lack of embedded English writing conventions hinders spelling acquisition. Additionally, the study underscores the importance of synonymous variations in SLA, reinforcing the hypothesis that students who engage more with artistic literature develop stronger expressive skills in both their native and second languages. These results suggest the need for greater emphasis on literary exposure in pre-university and university curricula to enhance linguistic competence.
References
1. Adamson, B. (2006). Fashions in language teaching methodology. In A. Davies & C. Elder (Eds.), *The handbook of applied linguistics* (pp. 604–622). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
2. Arievitch, I. M. (2017). *Beyond the brain: An agentive activity perspective on mind, development, and learning*. Sense Publishers. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325722300
3. Balboni, P. E. (1999). *Dizionario di glottodidattica*. Guerra Edizioni.
4. Belluscio, G., & Rrokaj, Sh. (2011). *Comparative dictionary of linguistics terms*. Arbëria.
5. Bredthauer, S., & Engfer, H. (2016). Multilingualism is great – but is it really my business? Teachers’ approaches to multilingual didactics in Austria and Germany. *Sustainable Multilingualism, 9*, 104–121. https://doi.org/10.1515/sm-2016-0013
6. Brown, D. E. (2025). The Historical Underpinnings of GTM.
7. Burns, A. (1999). *Collaborative action research for English language teachers*. Cambridge University Press.
8. Bushi, J., & Neçaj, L. (2024). Curriculum development and the challenges of foreign language teachers in pre-university education in Albania. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 4(4), 471.
9. Bygate, M., Skehan, P., & Swain, M. Brown, James Dean and Thom Hudson.
10. Bygate, M., Skehan, P., & Swain, M. (2013). Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing. Routledge.
11. Çepani, A. A., & Çerpja, A. A. (2026). Digital morphology of the Albanian language. Journal of Responsible Technology, 100151.
12. Chomsky, N. (1986). *Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use*. Greenwood Publishing Group.
13. Coady, J., & Huckin, T. (1997). Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy. Cambridge University Press.
14. Clahsen, H., & Muysken, P. (1986). The availability of universal grammar to adult and child learners-a study of the acquisition of German word order. Interlanguage studies bulletin (Utrecht), 2(2), 93-119.
15. Clifton, R. A., Perry, R. P., Roberts, L. W., & Peter, T. (2008). Gender, psychosocial dispositions, and academic achievement of college students. *Research in Higher Education, 49*(8), 684–703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-008-9104-9
16. Costache, B. (2025). Clickbait credibility: the impact of disingenuous influencer content on consumer behavior and brand equity.
17. Cungu, J. (2025). An Analytical Perspective on Monosemantic Words in the Explanatory Dictionary of the Albanian language. Folia Linguistica et Litteraria, (51), 251-264.
18. Enachescu, V. (2025). Exploring the relationship between social identity and academic engagement: a multi-cohort longitudinal analysis. International Journal of Education, Leadership, Artificial Intelligence, Computing, Business, Life Sciences, and Society, 1(01), 29-40.
19. Enesi, M., & Trifoni, A. (2023). An analysis of English writing errors of freshmen students’ essays: The case of ‘Aleksandër Moisiu’ University. *Athens Journal of Education, 10*(3), 482–497. https://doi.org/10.30958/aje.10-3-7
20. Fathi, H. (2018). A theory of teaching English language in higher education to improve English language social and communicative contexts. *Journal of Linguistics and Literature, 2*(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.12691/jll-2-1-1
21. Freddi, G. (1985). *Didattica delle lingue moderne*. ED Minerva Italica.
22. Galperin, P. YA.(1969). Stages in the development of mental acts. A handbook of contemporary soviet psychology, 249-273.
23. Gifford, D. D., Briceno-Perriott, J., & Mianzo, F. (2006). Locus of control: Academic achievement and retention in a sample of university first-year students. *Journal of College Admission, 191*, 18–25. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234630755
24. Griffiths, C. (2003). Language learning strategy use and proficiency. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Auckland.
25. Halliday, M. A. K. (1973). *Explorations in the functions of language*. London: Arnold.
26. Hymes, D. H. (2012). The concept of communicative competence revisited. In Thirty Years of Linguistic Evolution: Studies in honour of René Dirven on the occasion of his 60th birthday (pp. 31-58). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
27. Lantolf, J. P. (2024). On the value of explicit instruction: The view from sociocultural theory. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 39, 281-304.
28. Lundberg, A. (2019). Teachers’ beliefs about multilingualism: Findings from Q method research. Current issues in language planning, 20(3), 266-283.
29. Millaku, S., Lama, A., & Millaku, X. (2024). The articles of Albanian language are the key of Balkans and Indo-European languages A few remarks about the Albanian articles system: Stages of post positioning in Albanian. Available at SSRN 4898393.
30. Muhammadjon, N. (2025, February). REPRESENTATION OF POLYSEMY, SYNONYMY, AND HOMONYMY IN THE UZBEK ELECTRONIC THESAURUS. In INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF NATURAL AND SOCIAL-HUMANITARIAN SCIENCES (Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 24-26).
31. Mukli, P., Nagy, Z., & Eke, A. (2015). Multifractal formalism by enforcing the universal behavior of scaling functions. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 417, 150-167.
32. Nedbailik, S. R., & Smalyuga, D. V. TO THE QUESTION OF COgNITIVE ESSENCE OF LEXICAL SYNONYMY. АКТУАЛЬНЫЕ ПРОБЛЕМЫ СТИЛИСТИКИ, 149.
33. O’Madagain, C., & Tomasello, M. (2019). Joint attention to mental content and the social origin of reasoning. Synthese, 198(5), 4057–4078. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02327-1
34. Paivio, A. (1986). Dual coding theory: mental representation. A Dual Coding Approach.
35. Petcu, C., Enăchescu, V. A., & Costache, B. (2025). Leadership strategies and organizational management in schools: addressing adolescent anxiety in an era of growing challenges. In INTED2025 Proceedings (pp. 6941-6945). IATED.
36. Portolés, L., & Martí, O. (2020). Teachers’ beliefs about multilingual pedagogies and the role of initial training. International Journal of Multilingualism, 17(2), 248-264.
37. Renandya, W. A., & Jacobs, G. M. (2002). Extensive reading: Why aren’t we all doing it. Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice, 8, 295-302.
38. Richards, J. & Rodgers, T. (1999).Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Cambridge. Cambridge university press.
39. Richards, J. & Rodgers, T. (2014).Approaches and Methods in LanguageTeaching. Cambridge. Cambridge university press.
40. Schwartz, B. D., & Sprouse, R. A. (1996). L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model. Second language research, 12(1), 40-72.
41. Shahlo, K. (2025). LEXICAL SYNONYMY IN NEWS DISCOURSE. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY BULLETIN, 3(2), 42-47.
42. Stanojević, M. (2009). Cognitive synonymy: A general overview. FACTA UNIVERSITATIS-Linguistics and Literature, 7(2), 193-200.
43. Talibovna, I. G. (2025). Synonyms and Their Semantic Features. American Journal of Philological Sciences, 5(05), 226-228.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Education, Leadership, Artificial Intelligence, Computing, Business, Life Sciences, and Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.